One More

Jun. 30th, 2008 11:57 pm
omorka: (Doctor Borealis)
[personal profile] omorka
Today is (well, was, at this point) the centennial of the Tunguska fireball.

Date: 2008-07-01 05:35 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] quantumduck.livejournal.com
According to Dr. Raymond Stantz the Tunguska blast occurred in 1909. Clearly there is a cover up of the event's true date. Rather surprising given that it is the largest time-space rift in the 20th century. Clearly that event is why the 20th century attracts so many aliens, time travelers, and other trouble-makers.

(Obviously the well documented New York Zuul explosion of 1984 is the second biggest interdimensional cross-rip of the 20th century.)

Date: 2008-07-01 05:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] omorka.livejournal.com
Hmm. I wonder if the date really is different in the 'Busterverse, or if that's a deliberate error on Ackroyd's part, or if he flubbed the line but nobody noticed? (I vote (b).)

And I need an Egon icon . . .

Date: 2008-07-01 09:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] princejvstin.livejournal.com
Why would you vote b rather than c?

Date: 2008-07-01 03:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] omorka.livejournal.com
Dr. Stantz strikes me as the sort of person who rattles off lists of things from memory and gets them slightly wrong - a fabulously good memory for personal anecdotes and big-picture stuff, not so much a head for details, but he feels like he ought to be so he fakes it a bit. Knowing about Tunguska but being off a year on the date would fit that characterization. It also emphasizes the difference between the way Spengler and Stantz work - Spengler is a detail man all the way down, and 'builds up' a big picture from the details.

In other words, I'd prefer it be a deliberate part of the writing than Ackroyd simply not looking it up. :-)

Date: 2008-07-01 06:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] quantumduck.livejournal.com
I assumed it was an error caused by Akroyd simply ad-libbing so many lines. He may not have written the line at all, and simply attempted to recall the event's date during an extemporaneous take.

This would be consistent with his conspiracy rants in "Sneakers" and his overall love of parascience.

Date: 2008-07-02 01:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] omorka.livejournal.com
This is certainly a possibility, too. As far as I know, it's not addressed in any of the commentaries, so barring someone getting to ask Ackroyd, we'll probably never know. But speculation is half the fun of any compelling fictional 'verse, at least for me.

Profile

omorka: (Default)
omorka

July 2019

S M T W T F S
 1234 56
78910111213
14151617 1819 20
212223242526 27
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 30th, 2026 06:57 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios