Chalk it up to cultural literacy
Nov. 27th, 2004 03:09 amDM and
memeslayer dropped by to show us the South Park movie (thus the use of this icon; it does not denote, as it normally does, pissed-off-itude). I'm still mostly displeased with the content, but I have to agree with DM - the form was spot-on brilliant. (The Bernstein parody/pastiche sequence, in particular, was truly impressive.)
Beforehand, got to show off my 1337 Tarot skillz again. DM kibitzed, which I wish he wouldn't do, although he did say one thing that caught something I otherwise would have missed.
This having people scattered to the four winds, or at least the two blue ends of the country, has got to be fixed somehow.
--
Things to do:
1) Learn to tesser.
2) Learn to kythe.
3) Reread L'Engle.
4) Grade.
Not necessarily in that order.
Beforehand, got to show off my 1337 Tarot skillz again. DM kibitzed, which I wish he wouldn't do, although he did say one thing that caught something I otherwise would have missed.
This having people scattered to the four winds, or at least the two blue ends of the country, has got to be fixed somehow.
--
Things to do:
1) Learn to tesser.
2) Learn to kythe.
3) Reread L'Engle.
4) Grade.
Not necessarily in that order.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-27 01:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-27 06:26 am (UTC)I have too many friends and acquaintances in too far-flung locations.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-27 09:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-27 10:27 am (UTC)harumph - too many people, too many miles.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-27 03:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-27 04:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-27 05:23 pm (UTC)Although I must admit I'm not entirely sure what you're referring to.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-27 05:29 pm (UTC)Although I did enjoy Stan's encounter with a goddess-motif in the forest, I'll admit. ;)
no subject
Date: 2004-11-28 02:45 pm (UTC)Also, portraying Satan as more sympathetic than humans is hardly new. :-p
Aside from that nitpick, I think you're right, but you're missing the larger picture. Parker and Stone's standard technique is to make everyone involved in the situation they're parodying look like a complete fool. This is more visible in things like Team America and the Iraq War SP episode, but it's definitely there in the SP movie.
Or, if you prefer a socio-historical viewpoint, consider this. At the time it was made(1999), "censorship" in the media was a major issue(specifically, one of the most pressing issues for its target audience). In the wake of Columbine there were several movements to either ban or restrict entertainment. One angry parent even filed a lawsuit against the video game industry as a whole. For years, Senator Joe Lieberman had sought to restrict the access of minors to violent video games, despite no convincing evidence that they have any lasting effect on children. Parents in general panicked like a herd of sheep whenever a new "threat" was aired on the nightly news. This mentality needed and deserved every shred of the intellectual beating it got in South Park. I suspect mothers in particular were chosen because inattentive fathers bring up entirely different connotations(deadbeat dads, another major issue of the time[1]) which would have distracted from the message, but in any case they were just as much responsible for what went on as fathers were.
That's assuming Parker and Stone thought that far into it, of course. They might have just started writing lines at random until a movie came out.
[1] Or at least, the media chose to focus on it then.