omorka: (Default)
[personal profile] omorka
The migraine is almost over. I actually managed to go out today.

The 4th of July is coming up shortly, and it is a tradition in my family to make homemade ice cream for the 4th. So, armed with a BB&B 20%-off-one-item coupon, I set about looking for an ice-cream maker. The model I ended up with is a fairly substantial thing made by Cuisinart, a company that makes good food processors so I figured I'd trust them with a freezer-churner. It's a little small (it makes about a quart and a half at once), but it's cute and fairly compact.

Unlike the traditional ice-and-rock-salt models, which are difficult to use indoors, this one has a churner-bowl with some sort of semi-liquid gel in it. You stick the whole bowl in the freezer until it doesn't slosh when you shake it. The outside is plastic (so it doesn't stick to anything) and the inside is aluminum (to transfer the heat effectively away from the cream). The motor turns the bowl; the dasher is held in place inside it, with the ice-cream-to-be turning underneath the dasher. One feature (or, possibly, misfeature) is that the cover for the whole thing is open on top, so that you can add extra ingredients during churning (say, chocolate bits for a mint chocolate chip ice cream). In the summer in Houston, sweetened cream is an attractant for flies; I might get one of those net covers that are meant for barbecues for that.

So of course, I had to try it out:

--

1 cup milk
3/4 cup sugar (or less, to taste)

Whisk together until the sugar dissolves (about 3 minutes by hand, less with an electric beater). Add

2 cups heavy cream
1-2 teaspoons vanilla extract (to taste, and depends on strength)

Chill in refrigerator. Churn. Enjoy out of the churn as soft-serve, or ripen in freezer for 2 hours.

--

The one inconvenient thing about the freezer-bowl is that you can't store the leftover ice cream in the bowl. So I also invested in a couple of quart-and-a-half snap-top freezer containers.

My other recent purchase is a copy of the Voyager Tarot deck. It's . . . interesting. The card images are all collages of photographs of things like animals, plants, minerals, sculpture, random bits of technology, and (on the court cards and some of the Majors) human hands and faces. [livejournal.com profile] memeslayer, you might like it quite a bit - it's very stream-of-consciousness. [livejournal.com profile] quantumduck, you'll either love it or hate it (if you haven't seen it already). I'm ambivalent about its use of aquatic life in the Majors (I understand why all the echinoderms are on the Star, but why is the squid on the Hanged Man?). The Minors are just really hard to read. (There's an awful lot of fruit in the pentacles-equivalent cards. I understand why, but you'll be looking through the image, when WTF? Fruit!)

Then again, it's hard to dislike a deck with an Art Car in it.

Date: 2004-06-23 09:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bassfingers.livejournal.com
The LA Times Food Section had a shoot-out of 6 different ice cream makers today, and I believe your Cuisinart was their top pick. Two other models in the same price range had motors above the bowl that were apparently awkward to deal with; 2 models were the $250-$300 with built in compressors so no pre-freezing of bowls necessary; etc.

Date: 2004-06-24 02:56 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] omorka.livejournal.com
Yeah, I don't know if our electrical system would take well to a churner that had a built-in compressor. And if I really wanted one of those, I'd probably order it from a specialty cooking catalog instead of going out and buying one. Pre-freezing the bowl is actually not a big deal at all, provided I haven't just bought a whole bunch of meat to freeze (did I mention the freezer can be crowded sometimes?). And I know Cuisinart is good with appliances with a motor in the base (see also: food processors, blenders), so I figured this should last okay.

The issues with a top-motor churn are that the interior is completely inaccessible while churning, so things like chocolate chips have to be stirred in afterwards (while it's starting to melt on you), and that it's easy for the motor to burn out (or at least overheat) if the ice cream stiffens before the time's up.

I'm kitchen-geeking here; sorry. But I'm remarkably happy with it so far. (Coffee ice cream on demand, without having to leave the apartment . . . mmmm . . . .)

Hmm

Date: 2004-06-23 10:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] quantumduck.livejournal.com
I'm always nervous when people start with the Thoth deck, and then try to out weird it. That's my take on the Voyager Deck. I don't hate it . . . but I have trouble reading the cards. I'm also suspiscious of a deck which the creator sees as a gateway drug to a whole Newage outlook which they can supply to you. I just want a reading, is that so wrong?

Re: Hmm

Date: 2004-06-24 03:03 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] omorka.livejournal.com
I haven't ever read with the Thoth deck, partially because certain cards in the deck are known migraine triggers for a number of witches with migraines. (I've also been told that there's a cleaned-up/brightened version of the deck currently available for which that's not a problem, but I haven't tried to check it out yet.) However, the couple of images I remember don't seem to relate. So I'm not sure I see a connection between the two decks, although I'm willing to be convinced.

My take on the newage crap is that I can ignore it in favor of the cards themselves. I don't buy the separatist-feminist politics of the Motherpeace deck, either, but there are days when I really need it for a reading, or when the person I'm reading for needs it. I guess I'm not much of a New Critic when it comes to these things; I'm a Reader-Response Theorist (in every possible sense) when it comes to a tarot deck. (Even Historical Criticism only goes so far, like explaining why Waite jacked the Moon card.)

Re: Hmm

Date: 2004-06-24 09:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] memeslayer.livejournal.com
Jacked the Moon card?

Re: Hmm

Date: 2004-06-24 09:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] omorka.livejournal.com
Waite made some changes to the original designs of his cards in order to protect "secrets" of the magickal societies he was in at the time. One of the major alterations was to the Moon card, quite literally putting her "behind the Veil." That his reading for that particular card was "illusion" (correctly only an attribute of the Devil and the 7 of Cups) was a clue to what he'd done. Unfortunately, so many other decks have followed his lead that the originally correct meanings of the card ("intuition," among others) have been largely overshadowed - eclipsed? - by his prevarication.

Needless to say, I personally find this irksome.

Profile

omorka: (Default)
omorka

July 2019

S M T W T F S
 1234 56
78910111213
14151617 1819 20
212223242526 27
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 15th, 2026 11:28 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios